![]() |
| Biologist studying Paraponera clavata ants in Costa Rica. [1] |
All organisms live in a very competitive
world, where a strong defense system could mean the difference between life and
death. Thus many organisms have specific defenses, often consisting of many specialized
components. For example, you may be familiar with the human
immune system, which consists of five different types of white
blood cells that all have different functions. However, this kind of
specialized defense is not just limited to humans, of course. Other animals and
even plants have it, too. In fact, groups
of animals can sometimes also be thought of as having something like an immune
system, as they must defend their group as a whole.
![]() |
| Cephalotes varians left: soldier, right: worker [2] |
A superorganism is
comprised of many organisms and is most often used to describe a group of
eusocial animals. Eusociality
characterizes all ant species as well as some bees, wasps, termites and aphids.
The three main characteristics of these animals are 1) communal care of young
by adults, 2) overlap of generations, and 3) the division of labor between
reproductive and nonreproductive groups. This last trait is the most
interesting to defense because it allows for physically specialized individuals
whose main purpose is defense. This division can be very clearly seen in many turtle ant species where
there are very different looking queens, workers and soldiers. Our lab, in
collaboration with Scott Powell’s lab
at George Washington University, is studying Cephalotes varians, a species of turtle ant found in the Florida keys that has specialized soldiers with large,
round, plated heads that they use to block the entrances to the colony’s nests
– yes, nests! These ants
require multiple nests for one colony, which makes their division and
allocation strategy of soldiers and resources all the more important.
![]() |
| Cephalotes varians left: soldier guarding the entrance to a nest, right: worker [3] |
This ant system has many parallels to the
aforementioned human immune system. For example, the ant soldiers have very
different physical characteristics and behavior patterns from the workers, and
queens. This is similar to the white blood cells in humans, which are made with
different structures
from other cells to aid their specialized function of protecting the organism. This
means that both of these systems struggle with the cost-benefit balance of
defense, for if they produce more defenders, they have less energy and
resources to commit to other important functions. Both of these systems’ approaches
to dealing with this problem are similar and depend on external factors like available
resources and immediate threats. Thus the study of one system may help us
understand the other (Houston et al. 2007, Viney et al. 2005, Powell and
Dornhaus 2013).
![]() |
| Pineapple plant with heavily defended fruit [4] |
Another similar defense system is that of
plants. I know we don’t usually think of plants as having an immune system, but
they too have many predators, from hungry herbivores to bacterial parasites.
These organisms also face the cost-benefit conundrum. Additionally, they are
able to allocate existing resources to specific tissue types depending on their
relative value (Zangerl and Bazzaz 1992). For example, fruits can be considered highly
valuable to the plant, as they must invest a lot of nutrients into making them
and they directly produce the next generation of plants. However, their high
nutritional value is extremely attractive to animals, thus many plants spend a
lot of energy protecting their fruit. These defenses can be physical
(like spines) or chemical
(like acids that make the fruit bitter) that the plant specifically allocates
to the fruit (and often the outside layers of the fruit) in an attempt to
protect it. In ant colonies we can see a similar preference for defending high
quality nests (those with large cavities and thus the capacity to fit a lot of
eggs). Although these systems have many similarities, different aspects of each
have yet to be explored. Therefore, studying and relating these different
systems can give us new insights and perspectives on how each works and
possibly how other defense systems function and evolve (Kaspari and Byrne
1995).
Further Reading:
Hölldobler, Bert and Wilson, Edward. The Ants. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap
Press of Harvard University Press, 1990. https://books.google.com/books?id=R-7TaridBX0C&lpg=PA1&ots=sK1RgdxL7h&dq=the%20ants%2C%20wilson&lr&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q=the%20ants,%20wilson&f=false
Houston, A.I, MacNamara, J.M., Barta, Z.,
Klasing, K.C. (2007) “The effect of energy reserves and food Availability on
optimal immune defence.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274(1627):2835-2842
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/274/1627/2835.short
Viney, M.E., Riley, E.M., Buchanan, K.L. (2005)
“Optimal immune responses: immunocompetence revisited.” Trends in Ecology and
Evolution 20(12):665-669. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534705003204
Powell, S., Dornhaus, A. (2013)
“Soldier-based defences dynamically track resource availability and quality in
ants.” Animal Behaviour 85:157-164. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347212004800
Zangerl, A.R., Bazzaz, F.A. (1992) “Theory
and pattern in plant defense allocation.” Plant
Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens: Ecology, Evolution and Genetics. Ed.
Robert Fritz and Ellen Simms. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press,
1992. 363-391. https://books.google.com/books?id=ffDnW0ANW9wC&lpg=PA363&ots=VJE71bz6Ew&dq=zangerl%20and%20bazzaz%201992&lr&pg=PA363#v=onepage&q&f=false
Kaspari, M., Byrne, M.M. (1995) “Caste
allocation in litter Pheidole:
lessons from plant defense theory.” Behav Ecol Sociobiol 37:255-263. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00177405#page-1
Media Credits:
[1] Alexander Wild: http://www.alexanderwild.com/Ants/Myrmecology-the-Study-of-Ants/Personalities/i-mDNN3K8/A
[2] Alexander Wild: http://www.alexanderwild.com/Ants/Taxonomic-List-of-Ant-Genera/Cephalotes/i-fS7WtNr/A
[3] Alexander Wild: http://www.alexanderwild.com/Ants/Taxonomic-List-of-Ant-Genera/Cephalotes/i-mpwfQM2/A
[4] Chang’r: https://www.flickr.com/photos/chang-er/3754097832




No comments:
Post a Comment